<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>court order &#8211; Canyon Crest Guide Local News</title>
	<atom:link href="https://canyoncrestguide.com/tag/court-order/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://canyoncrestguide.com</link>
	<description>Canyon Crest News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2025 07:59:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Supreme Court blocks order to cover SNAP benefits — for now</title>
		<link>https://canyoncrestguide.com/supreme-court-blocks-order-to-cover-snap-benefits-for-now/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Ramos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2025 07:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1st circuit friday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appellate court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benefit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[break-neck appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food stamp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[month]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snap benefit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trump administration]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://canyoncrestguide.com/supreme-court-blocks-order-to-cover-snap-benefits-for-now/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[ad_1] The Supreme Court temporarily blocked an order late Friday night that would have forced the government to backfill the country’s largest anti-hunger program — a move the administration claimed would require it to “raid school-lunch money” to keep families fed. The decision, issued on behalf of the court by Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge blocks Trump from deploying California National Guard — or any Guard troops — in Oregon</title>
		<link>https://canyoncrestguide.com/judge-blocks-trump-from-deploying-california-national-guard-or-any-guard-troops-in-oregon/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Ramos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 07:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breathtaking abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california national guard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deploying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gov. newsom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[troops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trump]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://canyoncrestguide.com/judge-blocks-trump-from-deploying-california-national-guard-or-any-guard-troops-in-oregon/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[ad_1] Hours after California Gov. Gavin Newsom vowed to seek a court order to stop President Trump from deploying 300 of the state’s National Guard troops in Oregon, a federal judge issued a temporary restraining order on Sunday night. Officials from California and Oregon sought the restraining order after the president sent California Guard troops [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. judge said Trump administration violated order by sending immigrants on flight to Africa</title>
		<link>https://canyoncrestguide.com/u-s-judge-said-trump-administration-violated-order-by-sending-immigrants-on-flight-to-africa/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Ramos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 19:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[country]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detainee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[final destination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeland security official]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigrant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[official]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robbery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south sudan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas detention facility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tricia mclaughlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trump administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[u.s.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violated]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://canyoncrestguide.com/u-s-judge-said-trump-administration-violated-order-by-sending-immigrants-on-flight-to-africa/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[ad_1] The Trump administration violated a federal court order by deporting eight immigrants with serious criminal records to third countries in a flight that lawyers said had been headed to strife-torn South Sudan. U.S. District Judge Brian E. Murphy in Massachusetts said that migrants from Myanmar, Vietnam, Cuba, South Sudan and Mexico did not have [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>What happens if Trump doesn&#8217;t obey court orders? U.S. marshals in spotlight</title>
		<link>https://canyoncrestguide.com/what-happens-if-trump-doesnt-obey-court-orders-u-s-marshals-in-spotlight/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Ramos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 14:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boasberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contempt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doesnt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[el salvador prison midflight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marshals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spotlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephen monier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trump administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[u.s.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[u.s. marshals service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white house]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://canyoncrestguide.com/what-happens-if-trump-doesnt-obey-court-orders-u-s-marshals-in-spotlight/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[ad_1] WASHINGTON — As a couple of key court cases against President Trump’s executive actions intensify, questions of how and whether the White House will follow judges’ orders are mounting. Already, some judges have issued orders reprimanding the Trump administration and demanding action. But who has the authority to enforce such orders? Situated at the nexus of [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Diddy dismisses racial discrimination suit against Diageo</title>
		<link>https://canyoncrestguide.com/diddy-dismisses-racial-discrimination-suit-against-diageo/</link>
					<comments>https://canyoncrestguide.com/diddy-dismisses-racial-discrimination-suit-against-diageo/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Ramos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2024 21:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cîroc vodka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[combs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deleón tequila brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diageo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joint statement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mr. combs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[november]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prejudice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racial discrimination suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spirits llc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[times]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://canyoncrestguide.com/diddy-dismisses-racial-discrimination-suit-against-diageo/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[ad_1] Diddy has withdrawn his racial discrimination lawsuit against Diageo after accusing the spirits company of marginalizing his Cîroc vodka and DeLeón tequila brands. The embattled music mogul, whose once-celebrated career has hit rocky shoals since allegations of sexual assault were leveled against him last year, has resolved his ongoing dispute with the British beverage [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://canyoncrestguide.com/diddy-dismisses-racial-discrimination-suit-against-diageo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
