<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>state law &#8211; Canyon Crest Guide Local News</title>
	<atom:link href="https://canyoncrestguide.com/tag/state-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://canyoncrestguide.com</link>
	<description>Canyon Crest News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 15:54:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>L.A. wildfire victims would get mortgage relief under new bill</title>
		<link>https://canyoncrestguide.com/l-a-wildfire-victims-would-get-mortgage-relief-under-new-bill/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Ramos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 15:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[borrower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california bankers assn .]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harabedian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[l.a.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[last year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[month]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage lender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage relief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[servicer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wildfire]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://canyoncrestguide.com/l-a-wildfire-victims-would-get-mortgage-relief-under-new-bill/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[ad_1] Victims of last year’s wildfires in Los Angeles County who were unable to get mortgage relief under a state law enacted last year would get another chance with a stronger bill introduced Wednesday. The legislation, AB 1847, by Assemblymember John Harabedian (D-Pasadena), would triple to 36 months the 12 months of mortgage relief offered [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court sees a free-speech problem with laws that ban &#8216;conversion therapy&#8217; for minors</title>
		<link>https://canyoncrestguide.com/supreme-court-sees-a-free-speech-problem-with-laws-that-ban-conversion-therapy-for-minors/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Ramos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 20:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1st amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conversion therapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counselor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric shock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free-speech problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freespeech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[other state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex attraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talk therapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[therapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tuesday]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://canyoncrestguide.com/supreme-court-sees-a-free-speech-problem-with-laws-that-ban-conversion-therapy-for-minors/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[ad_1] WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court justices on Tuesday heard a free-speech challenge to state laws against “conversion therapy” and sounded likely to rule the measures violate the 1st Amendment. California and more than 20 other states have adopted laws to forbid licensed counselors from urging or encouraging gay or transgender teens to change their sexual orientation [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>HelloFresh settles consumer protection lawsuit with Santa Clara County for $7.5 million</title>
		<link>https://canyoncrestguide.com/hellofresh-settles-consumer-protection-lawsuit-with-santa-clara-county-for-7-5-million/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Ramos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 07:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automatic renewal subscription]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clara]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer protection lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[county]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false advertising practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free meal perk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hellofresh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[last week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meal-kit company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[million]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[santa clara county]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[term]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://canyoncrestguide.com/hellofresh-settles-consumer-protection-lawsuit-with-santa-clara-county-for-7-5-million/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[ad_1] HelloFresh agreed to pay $7.5 million to settle a consumer protection lawsuit brought by Santa Clara County. The lawsuit, filed in Santa Clara County Superior Court, alleged the meal-kit company had misled customers and made it difficult for them to cancel their subscriptions. As part of the settlement, which was approved last week, HelloFresh [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>California appeals Huntington Beach victory on voter ID laws</title>
		<link>https://canyoncrestguide.com/california-appeals-huntington-beach-victory-on-voter-id-laws/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Ramos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2025 06:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th appellate district]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[city charter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huntington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[huntington beach victory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[municipal election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[municipal issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orange county superior court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter id law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://canyoncrestguide.com/california-appeals-huntington-beach-victory-on-voter-id-laws/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[ad_1] After losing last month in Orange County Superior Court, the state of California is asking a state appellate court to overturn a Huntington Beach measure that could require voters to present photo identification to cast ballots in local elections. Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta and Secretary of State Shirley N. Weber, the state’s top elections [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Orange County sheriff blasts state sanctuary law but says deputies won&#8217;t do immigration enforcement</title>
		<link>https://canyoncrestguide.com/orange-county-sheriff-blasts-state-sanctuary-law-but-says-deputies-wont-do-immigration-enforcement/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Ramos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 12:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barnes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[county]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[county jail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deputies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deputy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration official]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local law enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orange county sheriff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanctuary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screen inmate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sheriff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state sanctuary law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supervisor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wont]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://canyoncrestguide.com/orange-county-sheriff-blasts-state-sanctuary-law-but-says-deputies-wont-do-immigration-enforcement/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[ad_1] Orange County Sheriff Don Barnes blasted a state sanctuary law that bars local law enforcement from contacting immigration officials when an undocumented immigrant is held in county jail, but he said he won’t direct his deputies to enforce immigration laws. “We have no desire to enforce immigration law — we never have, and we [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court turns down challenge of California suits by Uber, Lyft</title>
		<link>https://canyoncrestguide.com/supreme-court-turns-down-challenge-of-california-suits-by-uber-lyft/</link>
					<comments>https://canyoncrestguide.com/supreme-court-turns-down-challenge-of-california-suits-by-uber-lyft/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Ramos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2024 19:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitration agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broad lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california labor lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[challenge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company uber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor commissioner lilia garcia-brower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[last year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lyft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uber]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://canyoncrestguide.com/supreme-court-turns-down-challenge-of-california-suits-by-uber-lyft/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[ad_1] WASHINGTON —  The Supreme Court refused Monday to hear appeals from ride-hailing companies Uber and Lyft, which were asking to block California state labor lawsuits that seek back pay for tens of thousands of drivers. Without comment, the justices turned down appeals from both companies. At issue, they said, was the scope of the arbitration [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://canyoncrestguide.com/supreme-court-turns-down-challenge-of-california-suits-by-uber-lyft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Huntington Beach sues to block state law on trans student privacy</title>
		<link>https://canyoncrestguide.com/huntington-beach-sues-to-block-state-law-on-trans-student-privacy/</link>
					<comments>https://canyoncrestguide.com/huntington-beach-sues-to-block-state-law-on-trans-student-privacy/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Ramos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[block]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defending parent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huntington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[huntington beach sue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit tuesday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ordinance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual orientation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[student]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trans]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://canyoncrestguide.com/huntington-beach-sues-to-block-state-law-on-trans-student-privacy/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[ad_1] Huntington Beach is once again battling with California, filing a lawsuit this week that seeks to block a new state law that prohibits school officials from requiring teachers to notify families about students’ gender identity. The lawsuit Tuesday, which names Gov. Gavin Newsom, California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta and state Supt. of Public Instruction [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://canyoncrestguide.com/huntington-beach-sues-to-block-state-law-on-trans-student-privacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>California sues Huntington Beach over voter ID law</title>
		<link>https://canyoncrestguide.com/california-sues-huntington-beach-over-voter-id-law/</link>
					<comments>https://canyoncrestguide.com/california-sues-huntington-beach-over-voter-id-law/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Ramos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 04:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballot drop box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huntington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[huntington beach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[huntington beach city council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[march]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measure a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter id law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter id measure]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://canyoncrestguide.com/california-sues-huntington-beach-over-voter-id-law/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[ad_1] California has sued Huntington Beach, alleging that the city’s new law requiring voters to show photo identification is a violation of state law. The 320-page lawsuit, filed Monday in Orange County Superior Court, accuses Huntington Beach of violating California’s Constitution and the state election code over a new charter amendment that would require voters [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://canyoncrestguide.com/california-sues-huntington-beach-over-voter-id-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>State wins a round in fight with Huntington Beach to build more housing</title>
		<link>https://canyoncrestguide.com/state-wins-a-round-in-fight-with-huntington-beach-to-build-more-housing/</link>
					<comments>https://canyoncrestguide.com/state-wins-a-round-in-fight-with-huntington-beach-to-build-more-housing/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Ramos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2024 22:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th circuit court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[additional housing unit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[huntington beach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[november]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rapid hearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thursday]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://canyoncrestguide.com/state-wins-a-round-in-fight-with-huntington-beach-to-build-more-housing/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[ad_1] California’s lawsuit against Huntington Beach, which accused the city of defying state efforts to ease the housing crisis, appears to be back on a fast track after the suit was temporarily halted by a Superior Court judge in November. A three-judge panel at California’s 4th Circuit Court of Appeal instructed a lower court Thursday [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://canyoncrestguide.com/state-wins-a-round-in-fight-with-huntington-beach-to-build-more-housing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>6 flawed ways the Supreme Court could keep Trump on the ballot</title>
		<link>https://canyoncrestguide.com/6-flawed-ways-the-supreme-court-could-keep-trump-on-the-ballot/</link>
					<comments>https://canyoncrestguide.com/6-flawed-ways-the-supreme-court-could-keep-trump-on-the-ballot/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Ramos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2024 22:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[14th amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[argument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colorado supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congressional action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[former president trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurrection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jan.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trump]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://canyoncrestguide.com/6-flawed-ways-the-supreme-court-could-keep-trump-on-the-ballot/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[ad_1] I recently surmised that in considering former President Trump’s eligibility to run for office under the 14th Amendment, the U.S. Supreme Court will seek a national solution that applies to all 50 states. That dictates a reversal of the Colorado Supreme Court’s disqualification of Trump for engaging in insurrection, on grounds that preclude other [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://canyoncrestguide.com/6-flawed-ways-the-supreme-court-could-keep-trump-on-the-ballot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
